Multiracialism Is Doomed.

The enemies of man are living on borrowed time.

The enemies of man are in a bind: The harder they fight to remake the planet into an abomination of rootless mystery-meat people, the more irrevocably they seal the fate of their project.

---

Blank-Slatists find it convenient to cite 20th-century integration of European nationals as a success story of immigration in America which can be generalized to any other variety of maximally-alien peoples on the planet. This is problematic for several reasons [1]; this supposed “success” story was a failure in several ways, and it had several material advantages going for it which today’s immigration does not. In a nutshell:

1. Great Britain shared a deep-rooted genetic and cultural heritage with the rest of continental Europe well before the age of exploration ever commenced.

2. It was largely the Anglo-Saxon American culture which was debased to reflect the new lowest common denominator, rather than the European immigrants who changed to embody American culture.

3. The assimilation still hasn't been entirely successful to this day, and there are still noticeable differences in political alignment, wealth, and appearance if you care to look.

4. Vast swathes of the immigrants couldn't cut it as Americans and ended up moving back home.

5. What little success there was required an intense, prolonged propaganda campaign (targeted AT the immigrants mind you, not targeted at getting the Anglo-Saxon natives to "tolerate" them).

   Foreigners were made to Anglicize their surnames, stop referring to themselves with hyphenated identities, and become essentially visually + behaviorally indistinguishable from the native Anglo-Saxons: A task which is impossible for today’s aliens due to sheer skin color + morphology + etc. By contrast, today’s lot will let you know what offense they take if you pronounce Kiev or Turkey “wrong” (i.e. with the locations’ English pronunciations), as if we’ve ever had any obligation to call Munich “München” or to say “Deutschland” instead of Germany. What any sane person would recognize as a drastically-more hazardous experiment is met with MORE special pleading instead of less.

6. We didn't have the same welfare programs or affirmative-action caste hierarchies to activate the mindset of group competition for resources, and the innate differences in capabilities to produce & procure resources were drastically smaller among the relevant ethnic groups.

7. The European immigrants were imported over a less concentrated timeframe so the frog was boiled slower.

8. Social media wasn't a thing, so you were forced to actually interact with local communities rather than living in your own little world with your buddies back in Bomalia.

9. It was the native Anglo-Saxons who decided that other Europeans could be assimilated rather than an out of touch political elite who decided to go through with their plans despite consistent protests

10. Many Anglo-Saxon natives still regretted their prior decisions, and many people were very angry with the ways society was transforming at the time.

11. The most important, most controversial social issues and matters of law weren't federalized to anywhere near the same degree, so the Anglos who had particularly big gripes with the Irish way of life (or Italians or whoever) were allowed to live by themselves in their own little Anglos-only communities as a pressure-release valve that the natives had.

“Humanitarians” will call me a psychopath for writing what might as well be titled “The Moral Case For Ethnic Cleansing” [2], but they’ll never bother checking: Does the other side view us as Human, or would they at least cooperate in that prisoner’s dilemma if they could be convinced? If we want the project of multiracialism to work, it’s not the White racists who need an intense “denazification” effort thrown at them in schools or in the press or in reeducation camps. No, it is the maximally-alien peoples we’ve been importing at a record pace who don’t have any tradition sharing our way of thinking. If we want multiracialism to work (not that it’s worth pursuing), it is precisely the poor “oppressed” BIPOC folks who must be mind raped more intensely than anybody else. Of course, the Blank-Slatist “Humanitarians” are precisely those most lacking the heart to stomach this, for to them, European man is the bad guy of history. As such, somehow it feels like “punching down” to create the preconditions for multiracialism to work. If this sounds like a contrived reason to predict the inevitable victory of the White race, it really isn’t. The problem is already more concrete than people immediately realize when the concept is pointed out to them:

The NIMBY AWFLs and soyboy abundance libtards might’ve expected such a problem to never affect them, but it already has. It's not merely the Jews who will be excised from the DNC root and branch over the Gaza scandal, it's the Blank-Slatist true believers too, along with all the White men (and probably White women) of competence, who make a convenient target considering their vast overrepresentation in DNC leadership relative to their share of the DNC constituency. Once they’re a minority, all the more trivial for the foreign ethnic chauvinists to cement their domination over the party, even if the D.I.E. argument for further expulsion becomes obsolete long before this point. Even should White progressives come to their senses some day, there's a good chance they'll never get the opportunity to act on their newfound sobriety. Were it to occur at all, such a victory would also be a hollow one, for owning up to the innate inequality of man is a precondition for achieving it.

Intersectionalism, the coalition of the fringes, is premised upon the political enemy found in European man. Once he’s gone, they will turn on themselves in a heartbeat. Many have long remarked upon how, beyond the women + homosexuals + ethnic minorities + etc comprising the DNC’s coalition of the fringes, those few White men who still manage to find themselves wrapped up in it are weaker and less attractive on average than those who do not. Naturally, this has invited speculation that weak people get wrapped up in left-wing politics because they have the most to fear from confronting mobs of people, thereby making arguments regarding consensus and conformity work more effectively on weak people. This is mistaken. It’s neither consensus-driven argumentation nor fear of the mob inquisition which attracts weak peoples to the coalition of the fringes, at least not primarily. What attracts them is a political argument: If society treats certain persons as less valuable than others, there’s a good chance you may personally be one of those judged as lacking value. The herd of prey animals is less the product of a social-policing instinct than it is the product of a collective-safety instinct. In the specific case of group conflict, the reasoning is the same: If you do not recognize somebody as Human, then they may not recognize you as Human, and there will be conflict, and you might not win that conflict. Needless to reiterate, such cowardice is doomed as a solution to the political question: Those most partial to this fear are precisely those most unable to stomach what must be done to strangle the conflict in its crib.

Even within the bounded rationality of this way of thinking, it misses the forest for the trees. The political question is not solved once and for all by merely universalizing “Humanity” to include every variety of ape capable of producing viable offspring with European man. There is every possibility that our way of thinking will collide with the brick wall of artificial intelligences and extraterrestrial forms of alien life. This realization, the political instinct, is what allows pack animals, like men and wolves and cats, to occupy any mode of existence beyond that of the solitary tarantula.

This is why veganism is unworkable. Animals cannot be made to occupy the same political consciousness as men, for they cannot even speak with men. They can only be pacified as man’s servants and bent to the interests of men¹. It only makes sense that English becoming the world’s Lingua Franca would be a prerequisite for multiracialism becoming possible to attempt. Should the effects of shared language ever hit the brick wall of artificial intelligences or alien forms of extraterrestrial life, it will no longer be possible to maintain the delusion that tribal conflict can be averted simply by universalizing all intelligent beings into the same political consciousness. Indeed, such a project is already on its way to failure even for the variety of apes capable of producing viable offspring with European man, the ones who’ve already cleared the bar of aping his tongue.

Blank-Slatist “Humanitarians” and Multiracialists prefer keeping their heads in the sand for as long as possible rather than confronting the great questions of existence. This is all that Blank-Slatist “Humanitarianism” and Multiracialism has ever been: Cowardice. Weak people are leftists because of a political argument: If you don't think of yourself as somebody who can survive without Humanitarianism being powerful, you will do what you can to ensure that Humanitarianism remains powerful. “Humanitarians” aren’t completely stupid, but they can’t recognize their thinking for what it is. They are tarantulas, just like the rest of us.

Imagine:

The more the DNC becomes a party of mask-off foreign ethnic chauvinism, the more this will have a negative-polarization effect whereby the GOP is remade into a party of mask-off European ethnic chauvinism. Likewise: As above, so below: When an Uncle-Tom type mongrelizes with a foreign people, this debases the ancestry of that people, but as his legacy filters down, this also raises the ethnocentrism of the people he makes his union with. Discarding such men also has the effect of raising the ethnocentrism of the peoples they originate from. In effect, by allowing such mongrelization events, European man cuts off his foot to stop the spread of gangrene, and racial conflict only intensifies². Relying on voluntary mongrelization to end racial conflict is ineffective. Even relying on women being raped by packs of niggers is nothing to bank on, as these are the infants most likely to be aborted. The available remedies are twofold:

1. Remigration of all people of color.

2. Paraguay-style mongrelization at gunpoint

What was the point of this shit show? The United States of America was once a supermajority-White country. The nation’s first congress passed White-only immigration law a year before it passed The Bill Of Rights, and this federation, this once de-jure ethnostate, remained implicitly-White until 1997 when Bill Clinton declared [3] to a group of college students that America was now embarking “on its third great revolution” where America would “no longer be a European country.” The political question was once solved decisively. We had the utopia the Multiracialists claim to dream of where there is no racial conflict since everybody is the same shade of brown (that shade being White).

Multiracialism was once sold to the tune of John Lennon’s Imagine. Today, the consequences are finally manifest: The realization of his vision for the world means remaking Great Britain into Rape Island. Nobody is in the market for that nightmare anymore. You’re not a “dreamer” mister Lennon, you’re a traitor. Nobody is in the market for "this land is your land, this land is my land" any longer, they're in the market for a land which is only for the White man. They're in the market for vengeance against the people who are dispossessing them from their homelands.

It is by cowardice and treason alone that this nightmare was ever envisaged. To legitimate this, the B-S “Humanitarians” tell us the greatest lie ever told: That men are born innately equal in mental tendencies. That race is a “social fiction” cooked up to legitimate the transatlantic slave trade. That Blacks are poor because Whites are wealthy. That “White” and “Black” are mere skin colors and not ethnonyms. That it meant nothing for the political class to commit an involuntary civilizational-scale “suicide” on our behalf since there was never anybody around to kill in the first place.

Behold: The natural station of man, before the age of exploration ever commenced.

Question any of this? Question any of these conclusions which were laundered as “consensus” before the relevant evidence existed? This consensus status will be used to discredit anybody who actually bothers to check as being “pseudoscientists” thereby maintaining this “consensus” in its existence and in its circularity.

Want the foreigners gone? Not content with bending merely the scientific truth or the word of God to its whims, the state will warp the meaning of language itself: Not only isn’t it a nation state anymore, the state will have you know that it is the nation, that the alien janissaries it invites have “citizenship” just like you do, and that the state has the right to abolish the very nation which erected it. This state, whose very sovereignty is premised on the legal doctrine of “Discovery” (who discovered it?) to this day, will say that the alien invaders have just as much claim to the land as you do because you aren’t “indigenous” to the land.

Wonder why all the most important, most controversial matters of social policy are so ruthlessly globalized and federalized at a time when we’ve never been so polarized, never had less community, and have never imported such abjectly-alien peoples at such a rapid pace? Why the word of God, the empirical truth, and even the meaning of language itself are all so bent out of shape? In the short term, it may not help the cause of multiracialism to deny people the pressure release valve, but if people are allowed to visit any shining city on the hill, whether in the real world or by going down memory lane, it’s a wakeup call.

Today, the tide of history turns irrevocably, for multiracialism is doomed, and we now have the receipts and the vocabulary [2] to sound the wakeup call. Remember: A man in power needed merely to have a single wakeup call before the entire house of cards came crashing down shortly after.

There are many scalps to take, but the enemies of man are living on borrowed time. Fröhlich. Das Jagdhorn schallt. These oxygen thieves will beg for mere remigration.

References:

1. Last, S. (2018). The Myth Of European Assimilation. Ideas And Data. Retrieved from https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2018/08/07/the-myth-of-european-assimilation/

2. Angleson, N. (2025). The Multiracial “Nation”. Half-Baked Thoughts. Retrieved from https://werkat.substack.com/p/the-multiracial-nation

3. https://x.com/TooWhiteToTweet/status/1943350132939878701

1. Non-zero amounts of empathy can be extended to animals, but only on a basis of shared heritage. A key takeaway from evolution is that all beings are related, albeit to different degrees, in a tree-like manner. Mammals can hence empathize with each other and ‘grok’ elements of the natures of rival mammal species, in a way they cannot replicate with non-mammal species.

2. After all, this is essentially Kevin Macdonald’s case for explaining Jewish ethnocentrism; by sheer principle, the fact that—Jews even exist as a coherent biological category, even after all this time of living as a diaspora—is telling. In theory, this need not even come at too great a price to a group’s ancestry. Consider two immigration scenarios: In the first, a 200-IQ Indian man is imported. In the second, two 150-IQ Indian men are imported. Both scenarios have an equivalent effect on average polygenic scores within the population that the immigrants are imported to, but the latter scenario debases the ancestry of the population to twice the extent.