No, the white population will not decline in the future because people don’t get married simply because of race. People have the freedom to marry who they want to, regardless of race. Whites can still get married to each other. And if you’re so concerned about ‘white replacement’ then by all means you can go marry a white person, but that doesn’t mean that others in interracial marriages are prohibiting you or your freedom or anything. Besides, being racially diverse in genetics is actually beneficial because it strengthens your genes. There’s a reason why inbreeding is a problem.
You don't actually believe a word of this horseshit aside from maybe the inbreeding thing, you're just grasping for excuses to be indifferent to the genetic destruction of the population.
A) Of the children born to at least one white parent, only 80% are born to two of them. Taking .8 to the power of 10, that's a decimation of the white population within 10 generations. This is overly optimistic too because the rate of mongrelization is a function of the demographics of the population.
B) Once there's no longer a clear dividing line between groups, and ancestry has become a spectrum, there's no longer "freedom to marry" along racial lines. It doesn't matter how badly anybody else wishes to avoid you dragging them into the dirt, at some point it becomes a logistic impossibility for them.
Inbreeding depression also isn't a linear problem you fucking retard. Deleterious effects entirely vanish after 3 generations of distance, and within-euro genetic diversity is vastly higher than this.
> racists" (i.e. people who take issue with their continental ancestry group being mongrelized into extinction
This makes it seem as if the issue is people have kids with a kind of people. That phenomenon exists, but is marginal in effects compared to discrimination in access to power and not having kids at all
Assuming 20-year generation times, this means that in 100 years, there will be only 32% (0.8 ^ 5) as many racially pure whites as there are today. Likely, the rate will only get progressively worse as the number of purebred whites drops.
...and this statistic presumably includes as white Jews, Arabs, all Iranians, people from the Caucasus and Central Asia and other off-white gold-chain-wearers--these groups have long been classified as white by the American bureaucracy. So, if the matter concerns 'racially pure whites', you're really talking about a rather smaller percentage.
No, the white population will not decline in the future because people don’t get married simply because of race. People have the freedom to marry who they want to, regardless of race. Whites can still get married to each other. And if you’re so concerned about ‘white replacement’ then by all means you can go marry a white person, but that doesn’t mean that others in interracial marriages are prohibiting you or your freedom or anything. Besides, being racially diverse in genetics is actually beneficial because it strengthens your genes. There’s a reason why inbreeding is a problem.
You don't actually believe a word of this horseshit aside from maybe the inbreeding thing, you're just grasping for excuses to be indifferent to the genetic destruction of the population.
A) Of the children born to at least one white parent, only 80% are born to two of them. Taking .8 to the power of 10, that's a decimation of the white population within 10 generations. This is overly optimistic too because the rate of mongrelization is a function of the demographics of the population.
B) Once there's no longer a clear dividing line between groups, and ancestry has become a spectrum, there's no longer "freedom to marry" along racial lines. It doesn't matter how badly anybody else wishes to avoid you dragging them into the dirt, at some point it becomes a logistic impossibility for them.
Inbreeding depression also isn't a linear problem you fucking retard. Deleterious effects entirely vanish after 3 generations of distance, and within-euro genetic diversity is vastly higher than this.
> racists" (i.e. people who take issue with their continental ancestry group being mongrelized into extinction
This makes it seem as if the issue is people have kids with a kind of people. That phenomenon exists, but is marginal in effects compared to discrimination in access to power and not having kids at all
According to CDC data, the percentage of children born to at least one white parent who are born to two white parents is only 80% in the US.
https://twitter.com/SBAbsolutist/status/1753239352409194516
Assuming 20-year generation times, this means that in 100 years, there will be only 32% (0.8 ^ 5) as many racially pure whites as there are today. Likely, the rate will only get progressively worse as the number of purebred whites drops.
...and this statistic presumably includes as white Jews, Arabs, all Iranians, people from the Caucasus and Central Asia and other off-white gold-chain-wearers--these groups have long been classified as white by the American bureaucracy. So, if the matter concerns 'racially pure whites', you're really talking about a rather smaller percentage.
This
https://open.substack.com/pub/josephbronski/p/how-white-demographic-decline-is?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=m9k7g